Welcome to PaulFranklin.ca
The official website of Paul Franklin: a father, veteran, activist, motivational speaker, and proud Canadian.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Those who attack by the pen must be able to accept that they can be attacked by the pen.

Rick Mercer wrote a great article a few years ago and it defiantly bears repeating especially as we head into the holiday season.  Those who attack by the pen must be able to accept that they can be attacked by the pen.  Noreen Golfman wrote a piece in the Independent about her dislike of the war in Afghanistan and how it ruined her Christmas vacation.. written on December 1,  2007.
Independent 12 01 07 
Noreen Golfman 
Blowing in the wind . . . 
Between mouthfuls of fruitcake and blissful stretches of catch-up sleep, you couldn’t ignore the war (oh, sorry, is that peaceful restoration work?) in Afghanistan during the holiday season if you tried. On the one hand, you were given license to let go and savour slow food, idle afternoons, and the constant pleasure of friends and family—in other words, fully appreciate the privileges of life in the West; on the other hand, you were constantly reminded of Our Boys our on patrol, eating reconstituted turkey in the Afghan desert—in other words, invited to feel guilty for not chowing down sand and fighting the war on terror. 
Every time you opened a newspaper or listened to the news, especially on the CBC, you were compelled to reach for the box of tissues. If it wasn’t a story about some poor sod’s legs being blown off then it was an extended interview with some dead soldier’s parents. Indulging in another bite of dark chocolate was meant to be more painful this year. Here, have a plate of guilt with your second helping, my dear, and pass the self-reproach. 
Amidst all the cranked up sentimentality and the daily barrage of stories from the likes of reporter Christy ‘one of the boys’ Blatchford or Peter ‘not exactly on the front lines’ Mansbridge, The Globe and Mail’s television columnist, John Doyle, dared to question the nature of the coverage. Doyle openly wondered, as is his right and responsibility, what in the world the public broadcaster was doing, let alone his own privately owned newspaper, devoting so much mawkish attention to the Canadian troops? 
It’s one thing to pay full respect to the men (and some women) who have chosen a life in uniform and are therefore more or less voluntarily enduring punishing conditions, risking their lives many thousands of miles away from the comforts of home. 
It is another to report on their presence in that unfamiliar place without so much as a hint that they don’t belong there, that the campaign to restore order and keep the Taliban from returning to power might be doomed, that blood is obviously begetting blood and that Canadians, and especially the Newfoundlanders who comprise such a disproportionate percentage of the overseas troops (compare with the number of African-Americans fighting in the doomed project of Viet Nam), are destined to return in body bags. 
Shouldn’t we—the media, our public intellectual, citizens in general—at least be questioning, not merely glorifying or going sloppy over this fact? 
Any time anyone questions the coverage, as Doyle did and as this column is venturing to do, you can practically hear the rage mounting in the neck veins of the military huggers. Peter Mansbridge threw a public hissy fit, obviously protesting too much. And Doyle told his readers that he’d been receiving some pretty nasty hate mail after his columns in December, not surprising, really, when you consider how defensive people are about the troops. I expect I’ll get some ugly stuff, too. It is a trite irony that you are chastised for daring to question the purpose of the military mission when that very mission is allegedly about restoring democracy and freedom of speech. 
Which leads me to kick at another sacred cow--that is, Rick Mercer and that whole lot of star Newfoundlanders who went over to entertain Our Boys (and Girls) over Christmas, reportedly flown to unmarked destinations and, presumably, forced to share some dehydrated food and wear really ugly clothing for a few days.

Tomb of the Unknown in Ottawa.
The unidentified soldier was selected from a cemetery in the vicinity of 
Vimy Ridge, the site of a famous Canadian battle of the First World War.  The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier was created to honour the Canadians whether they be navyarmyair force or merchant marine, who died or may die for their country in all conflicts - past, present, and future.

What in the world is going on? Where are the protest songs of yesteryear? I guess, when General Rick ‘MUN Graduate’ Hiller invites you to come along and share the joy ride you have to join up faster than you can say ‘Bob Hope is dead.’ Reading Mercer’s widely circulated piece on the joys of serving gravy to the grateful Canadian boys was almost as painful as watching Peter McKay flirt with Condoleezza ‘Condee’ Rice. 
Just when did the worm turn? When was it suddenly acceptable for your garden variety progressive, satire-loving celebrity to hug the troops, praise military actions, and pass the ammunition without so much as a hint of dissent or any questioning of the value of the mission, not to mention its obviously USA-linked agenda? Can you imagine popular talk show host Jon Stewart flying overseas over for a few feel-good shows in Iraq? 
What looking-glass world have Rick and his talented cronies walked into? 
But not here, not if you listen to Stephen Harper, not if you are getting all warm and fuzzy about how meaningful it is to stand in line waiting for a double double at the Tim Horton’s shop in Kandahar, not if Christy Blanchard’s columns make you cry, and you want to make Rick Mercer and his buddies honourary soldiers. 
It is really hard to see how the road to open debate, let alone peace, can be paved with military offensives and the song and laugh shows of Newfoundland talent, and there is something deeply disturbing about the unquestioning belief that it can. 
Fighting Words
By Courtesy (St. John's)
The Independent
Friday, January 26, 2007
By Rick Mercer
For The Independent
Poor Noreen Golfman. She wrote in her Jan. 12 column (Blowing in the Wind … ) that her holidays were ruined by what she felt were incessant reports about Canadian men and women serving in Afghanistan. So upset was Noreen that, armed with her legendary pen, sharpened from years in the trenches at Memorial University’s women’s studies department, she went on the attack. I know I should just ignore the good professor and write her off as another bitter baby boom academic pining for what she fondly calls “the protest songs of yesteryear,” but I can’t help myself. A response is exactly what she wants; and so I include it here. After all, Newfoundlanders have seen this before: Noreen Golfman, sadly, is Margaret Wentewithout the wit. 
Paul Franklin's medals  The sacrifice medal is for grievous wounds in the face of the enemy... it showcases the memorial in Vimy of Canada crying for her fallen.
Dear Noreen,
I am so sorry to hear about the interruption to your holiday cheer. You say in your column that it all started when the CBC ran a story on some “poor sod” who got his legs blown off in Afghanistan.
The “poor sod” in question, Noreen, has a name and it is MCpl. Paul Franklin. He is a medic in the Forces and has been a buddy of mine for years. I had dinner with him last week in Edmonton, in fact. I will be sure to pass on to him that his lack of legs caused you some personal discomfort this Christmas.
Paul is a pretty amazing guy. You would like him I think. When I met him years ago he had two good legs and a brutally funny sense of humour. He was so funny that I was pretty sure he was a Newfoundlander. You probably know the type (or maybe you don’t) — salt of the earth, always smiling, and like so many health-care professionals, seemingly obsessed with helping others in need. 
These days he spends his time training other health-care workers and learning how to walk again. That’s a pretty exhausting task for Paul … heading into rehabilitation he knew very well his chances of walking again were next to none, considering he’s a double amputee, missing both legs above the knee. 
At the risk of ruining your day Noreen, I’m proud to report that for the last few months he has managed to walk his son to school almost every morning and it’s almost a kilometre from his house. Next month Paul hopes to travel to Washington where he claims he will learn how to run on something he calls “bionic flipper cheetah feet.” The legs may be gone but the sense of humour is still very much intact. 
Forgive me Noreen for using Paul’s name so much, but seeing as you didn’t catch it when CBC ran the profile on his recovery I thought it might be nice if you perhaps bothered to remember it from here on in. This way, when you are pontificating about him at a dinner party, you no longer have to refer to him simply as the “poor sod,” but you can actually refer to him as Paul Franklin. You may prefer “poor sod” of course; it’s all a matter of how you look at things. You see a “poor sod” that ruined your Christmas and I see a truly inspiring guy. That’s why I am thrilled that the CBC saw fit to run a story on Paul and his wife Audra. I would go so far as to suggest that many people would find their story, their marriage and their charitable endeavours inspiring. Just as I am sure that many readers of The Independent are inspired by your suggestion that Paul’s story has no place on the public broadcaster.
Further on in your column you ask why more people aren’t questioning Canada’s role in Afghanistan. I understand this frustration. It’s a good question. Why should Canada honour its United Nations-sanctioned NATO commitments? Let’s have the discussion. I would welcome debate on the idea that Canada should simply ignore its international obligations and pull out of Afghanistan. By all means ask the questions Noreen, but surely such debates can occur without begrudging the families of injured soldiers too much airtime at Christmas?
Is it worth the fight?
Personally, I would have thought that as a professor of women’s studies you would be somewhat supportive of the notion of a NATO presence in Afghanistan. After all, it is the NATO force that is keeping the Taliban from power. In case you missed it Noreen, the Taliban was a regime that systematically de-peopled women to the point where they had no human rights whatsoever. This was a country where until very recently it was illegal for a child to fly a kite or for a little girl to receive any education. 
Afghan woman being executed by the Taliban in 2001 in Kabul on the main soccer field and the puff on the ground is the bullet leaving her skull and hitting the playing field.
To put it in terms you might understand Noreen, rest assured the Taliban would frown on your attending this year’s opening night gala of the St. John’s International Women’s Film Festival. In fact, as a woman, a professor, a writer and (one supposes) an advocate of the concept that women are people, they would probably want to kill you three or four times over. Thankfully that notion is moot in our cozy part of the world but were it ever come to pass I would suggest that you would be grateful if a “poor sod” like Paul Franklin happened along to risk his life to protect yours. 
And then of course you seem to be somehow personally indignant that I would visit troops in Afghanistan over Christmas. You ask the question “When did the worm turn?” Well I hate to break it to you, but in my case this worm has been doing this for a long time now. It’s been a decade since I visited Canadian peacekeeping operations in Bosnia and this Christmas marked my third trip to Afghanistan. Why do I do it? Well I am not a soldier — that much is perfectly clear. I don’t have the discipline or the skills. But I am an entertainer and entertainers entertain. And occasionally, like most Canadians, I get to volunteer my professional time to causes that I find personally satisfying. 
As a Newfoundlander this is very personal to me. On every one of these trips I meet Newfoundlanders who serve proudly in the Canadian Forces. Every day they do the hard work that we as a nation ask of them. They do this without complaint and they do it knowing that at every turn there are people like you, Noreen, suggesting that what they do is somehow undignified or misguided. 

I am also curious Noreen why you refer to the head of the Canadian Forces, General Rick Hillier, as “Rick ‘MUN graduate’ Hillier.” I would suggest that if you wish to criticize General Hillier’s record of leadership or service to his country you should feel free. He is a big boy. However, when you dismiss him as “Rick ‘MUN Graduate’ Hillier” the message is loud and clear. Are you suggesting that because General Hillier received an education at Memorial he is somehow unqualified for high command? We are used to seeing this type of tactic in certain national papers — not The Independent.
You end by saying you personally cannot envision that peace can ever be paved with military offensives. May I suggest to you that in many instances in history peace has been achieved exactly that way.
The gates of Auschwitz were not opened with peace talks. Holland was not liberated by peacekeepers and fascism was not defeated with a deft pen. Time and time again men and women in uniform have laid down their lives in just causes and in an effort to free others from oppression. 
It is unfortunate, Noreen, that in such instances people like yourself may have your sensitivities offended, especially during the holiday season, but perhaps that is a small price to pay. Best wishes for the remainder of 2007; may it be a year of peace and prosperity.

Of course for myself one of the more amusing facts is that Memorial University has a new 
Chancellor as of 2008.
Gen Rick Hillier (ret) Chancellor of Memorial University 
"Memorial University College opened its doors on the old Parade grounds in St. John's to a total student body of 55 on September 15, 1925.  The college was established as a memorial to the Newfoundlanders who had lost their lives on active service during the First World War; it was later rededicated to also encompass those lost in the Second World War. " 
"The university's motto, Provehito in Altum (Launch forth into the deep), captures the spirit of the adventure of learning and urges students to extend the frontiers of knowledge.  The Arms of Memorial University have as their central element a cross, a symbol of sacrifice. Its anchor-shaped ends signify the hope that springs from devotion to a good cause. The wavy bars allude to our maritime setting, and the three books signify our educational role.  White and claret, derived from the Cross of St. George, are the colours of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment: red for courage and sacrifice, and white for purity. Gold is associated with nobility and generosity. The colours remind us that courage tempered with mercy may be enlisted in the service of noble causes."    www.mun.ca
 Many students and faculty do not agree with the idea that someone like Gen Hillier (ret) should be a Chancellor of an academic institution... I of course feel differently.  It follows in the historical traditions of the University and its these traditions and memories that we must never forget.
When you have consensus and the lack of free speech that are typical of most higher education institutions as of late (one only has to have a pro Israeli position in a place like Ryerson to see the results) these very institutions fail in their mandates of promoting free speech and debate.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Books on Afghanistan and a review from the Literary Review of Canada


http://www.amazon.ca/Long-Walk-Home-Franklins-Afghanistan/dp/1897142250

  Product Description

The Canadian media were the first to bring Master Corporal Paul Franklin’s story to the public, and it is only fitting that award-winning journalist Liane Faulder brings the full account of his return from a war zone. The Long Walk Home: Paul Franklin’s Journey from Afghanistan documents the recovery of a soldier injured in a 2006 suicide bombing that left one Canadian diplomat dead, and two comrades in arms wounded. Although Franklin struggled to keep a promise to his wife that he would come home alive, with the heroic help of soldiers on the scene and a medical team abroad, he survived to keep his word. He lost both of his legs above the knee as the result of his injuries, but returned home determined to walk again. Within four months of his injury, and against the odds and predictions of doctors, Franklin learned to walk on artificial legs. He continues to represent the courage of Canadian troops overseas as he rebuilds his life at home with his wife Audra and their young son, Simon. As a family on a journey to recovery, they are determined to stand, and walk, together. The Long Walk Home: Paul Franklin’s Journey from Afghanistan is a story of loss, courage, love and hope. It inspires all of those — military and civilians alike — who wonder how they will take that next step when tough times challenge the body and the spirit.

  About the Author

Liane Faulder is a feature writer with Sunday Reader, the Edmonton Journal-s weekly flagship feature section which emphasizes long-form journalism. Her features have also been published in Chatelaine, Today-s Parent and Alberta Venture magazines. She has been a regular contributor to CBC radio, writing for the weekday national opinion segment, " Commentary" , as well as sitting on news panels and penning a column for CBC-s syndication service when she was a TV critic for theEdmonton Journal from 2001 to 2003. In April 2006, Liane-s personal essay, " About the Boys" , was published in Dropped Threads Three.
cover image

Inside the Wire
The limited but important story told by embedded journalism.
Christopher Waddell is associate director of Carleton University’s School of Journalism and Communication and holds the Carty Chair in Business and Financial Journalism. He is a former CBC TV parliamentary bureau chief and executive producer of news specials, and prior to that was a reporter, Ottawa bureau chief, associate editor and national editor of The Globe and Mail.
“Afghanistan has been a tortured country for longer than any of us has been paying attention. Now that our own injuries have caught our attention, it becomes clear that if we can help pull the country out of the abyss, we must. And, equally, if we can’t help, we mustn’t make things even worse.
The right thing has to be done in Afghanistan. Whatever that is.”
Canadian troops have been fighting in Kandahar for almost three years and will be there for at least two more. Yet when that ends, as Prime Minister Stephen Harper says it will in 2011, we may be no closer to resolving the dilemma posed in the introduction toOutside the Wire: The War in Afghanistan in the Words of Its Participants, Kevin Patterson and Jane Warren’s collection of writings and reflections from Canadian soldiers and civilians who have served in Afghanistan. What is the right thing to do?
That dilemma is the subtext that runs through all the books discussed in this review, which look from the ground up at the Canadian military in action in Kandahar in the period from early 2006 through to mid 2007. In that time, three different six-month rotations of Canadian troops came through the region, and they were all trailed by journalists. Those journalists were producing history on the run—daily accounts of what happened on the ground for news outlets back home. A few have now translated those accounts into something more permanent, placing what has happened into a broader context that profiles the Canadian military in the 21st century. To varying degrees each book is based on embedding journalists with units of the Canadian Forces or relies on the words and writings of the soldiers themselves as well as other Canadians in Afghanistan in ancillary roles supporting the troops.
Leave aside the hand-wringing of those who worry that embedding reporters with the military produces captives who simply parrot the military line on the mission. It is certainly true that when you rely on others to risk their lives—even to die— protecting you, you develop a degree of respect and admiration for them and what they do. That is understandable.
It is also true that embedding produces a limited perspective on a conflict because it reflects mainly a soldier’s-eye view of the world. In Afghanistan, that means reporters cannot tell the equally important story of how the actions of Canadian and other troops affect Afghans. The technique provides only a very narrow view of a battle or a war, but as long as readers, listeners and viewers understand that, it plays a crucial role in trying to convey what is taking place in Afghanistan and what happens to those we sent there to fight, whom we will have to support once they return. Embedding reporters with the troops provides a window on the military, the people in it and their families that the media and Canada in general have ignored for much of the past half century.
Embedding also encourages the military to try to shape information to its advantage, even though there is no broad censorship beyond restrictions on reporting deaths and injuries until families have been notified and a ban on revealing operational issues (for which there appears to be no common or consistent military interpretation). In fact, more often than not, the military shortchanges itself by refusing to provide reporters with details of engagements with the Taliban or the roles of individual soldiers in those battles, precisely the details that turn dry incident reports into compelling stories. What emerges from this collection of books is a profile of a war unlike any Canada has fought before, and not just because it is a counter-insurgency and not a traditional war against another nation’s army with the objective of advancing and taking territory that will ultimately lead to victory. Soldiers in Afghanistan regularly travel and fight in temperatures of above 40°C, weighed down by body armour that on many occasions has helped save lives. Sand and dust are everywhere. The enemy is there one minute and gone the next, melting away from a firefight or ambush into Panjwayi irrigation ditches, poppy and grape fields, or the communities scattered throughout the region that Canadian troops patrol. That means the Canadians operate under the belief they are being watched all the time and are never sure who is a villager or farmer and who is an informant for the Taliban, regularly reporting the movement and location of Canadian troops. As a fighting force, the Taliban are respected by the Canadians for their tactics and strategy, so much so that some Canadian commanders have spent time learning the history of warfare in the Kandahar region. They discover the Taliban travel by the same routes and use the same ambush sites as were used successfully by the mujahedeen in their battle against the Soviets in the 1980s.
What emerges from this collection of books is a profile of a war unlike any Canada has fought before
Unlike the early days of Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan, Canadian soldiers now have modern equipment, and the result is a very effective hightech fighting force designed specifically to combat counter-insurgency. They have everything from tanks to artillery to airborne drones to vehicles designed to withstand roadside bombs to the ability to call in supporting air strikes and medical evacuations when needed. In what should be a mismatch, they battle an enemy that drags its wounded and dead away from fights by hand and that relies on the primitive weapons of guerilla fighters everywhere—rocket- propelled grenades, AK-47 rifles, land mines and, their most effective weapon, improvised explosive devices. The IEDs are made from old artillery shells or anything else that might be available and are set off either remotely or by the weight of Canadian vehicles as they drive over them. They have killed and continue to kill and wound more Canadians than have died in combat. They are a faceless enemy, an unseen force that leaves the Canadian troops with no way to hit out at anyone in retaliation. In Fifteen Days: Stories of Bravery, Friendship, Life and Death from Inside the New Canadian Army, Christie Blatchford quotes Captain Sean Ivanko after one lethal attack: “Literally, I was consumed with rage, every single cell of my body was screaming for vengeance, was screaming out with this blind rage.”
It is a war that is full of frustration, anger, confusion and uncertainty, as well as pride, accomplishment, heroics and camaraderie in the face of death and dismemberment. With a journalist’s eye, Blatchford reflects all of that in telling the stories of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan. Her open admiration for the soldiers she met and travelled with in Kandahar and the families who have lost their children produces empathetic vignettes that capture the personalities of the soldiers and their successes. It also generates an often overwhelming sense of sadness at the losses. Yet all that does not blind Blatchford to things a journalist should note. She watches for military news management and finds it behind the sudden removal of herself and other journalists from a forward operating base just a day after they travelled there with a Canadian patrol and a day before military confirmation that a Canadian and a U.S. soldier had been killed by friendly fire, recalling the storm in Canada when four soldiers were killed by a U.S. air strike in 2002.
My suspicion, then and now, is that we were removed to avoid inflaming that sentiment and fuelling doubts about the Afghanistan mission. The lid was on—and stayed on tight. The military doesn’t have confidence that we in the press understand, and can put into context, what a friendly-fire death does and does not mean. Keeping the thing secret only feeds the sense there is something to hide.
All the books also note that the objectives in Kandahar are much more murky than in any of Canada’s past wars. In Outside the Wire, Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry commanding officer Lieutenant Colonel Ian Hope, who led Task Force Orion, the initial rotation of Canadian troops in mid 2006, talks about the staple of Canadian military action in Kandahar, the patrols that keep the Taliban off balance:
These tactical military actions were conducted not to inflict casualties, because the enemy had a phenomenal capacity to reconstitute, but instead to continuously increase Afghan confidence and to keep the enemy disrupted. Only by doing so could we buy time for the Afghan National Security Forces to grow and develop, and for governance and reconstruction reforms to gain traction. This will take many years.
The books all note the pride many soldiers take in increasing security in communities and establishing schools and their hopes that these achievements are worth the cost. As Captain Martin Anderson describes in a visit to an orphanage in Outside the Wire, “I believe that the answer lies not with the adults—who are already entrenched in their views of the world—but with the children … Hopefully, it will help the children there realize that a better future awaits them, and that the international community won’t turn its back on them as it has in the past.”
That means overcoming the setbacks and frustration of taking and retaking the same ground. Blatchford quotes Regimental Sergeant Major Randy Northrup after returning home to St. Albert, Alberta: “That’s hard for our soldiers to swallow. The same piece of ground. We’ve been here twice now. Three times now. And each time it costs you. And that’s probably the hardest thing to swallow, that cost and it’s probably the highest cost you can pay.”
That uncertainty, frustration, confusion and fear, always present in warfare, are completely absent from Lee Windsor, David Charters and Brent Wilson’s Kandahar Tour: The Turning Point in Canada’s Afghan Mission. This is a volume written about the third rotation of troops to Kandahar from February to August 2007. While the subtitle is bold and, in retrospect, naive, it reads like the official view of the war by National Defence and the Canadian government. On its pages all leaders are inspired and all troops are well prepared, resourceful, experienced, cool under pressure, knowledgeable and disciplined. They fire with careful precision that avoids harming the civilian population and do only very limited property damage. Whenever one of their colleagues is killed, the soldiers pause briefly to remember and then get back to the job at hand. The media concentrate, meanwhile, almost exclusively on soldier deaths, looking for someone to blame while ignoring the reconstruction and diplomatic efforts and successes that are part of Canada’s mission. Windsor, Charters and Wilson offer a solid review of Afghanistan’s conflict filled history and a good analysis of the rise, activities and current state of the Taliban, but Kandahar Tour presents an antiseptic view of Canadians at war starkly different from all the other accounts, at times reading more like the script of a World War Two newsreel about troops in action.
Kandahar Tour presents an antiseptic view of Canadians at war, reading more than the other accounts like the script of a World War Two newsreel.
By contrast, split into sections on service, sacrifice and stories, On Assignment in Afghanistan: Maritimers at War tells the personal stories of that same group of troops, the members of 2 RCR, the Royal Canadian Regiment battle group based in Gagetown, New Brunswick, that included reservists from all over Atlantic Canada. A project of Halifax’s Chronicle Herald, the book is published largely as a pictorial tribute to the local men and women who served in Afghanistan from a region of the country that has always been the backbone of Canada’s military.
The photographs highlight the conditions under which the troops live, patrol and fight, and remind Canadians that not all of Afghanistan is dust and dirt, since many of the pictures come from the agricultural regions of the Panjwayi. The text is largely about the personalities of the soldiers, even including such asides as the annual premium of $20,000 paid to all those who serve in Afghanistan and the frustration of some that the pay is the same for those on dangerous patrols and stationed at forward operating bases as for those who never leave the comforts and safety of Kandahar air field. Author Chris Lambie also touches on many of the themes found in the other books, such as helping communities, educating children, training local soldiers, coping with the deaths of colleagues and improving the poor quality of local Afghan police.
All of that and more emerge in greater detail in Contact Charlie: The Canadian Army, the Taliban and the Battle That Saved Afghanistan, former National Post reporter and army reservist Chris Wattie’s record of his time spent in 2006 with C Company of Task Force Orion. He argues the Canadians’ objective was to prevent the Taliban from scoring a public relations coup in 2006: the insurgents had been planning to take over a prominent building in Kandahar, at least for a brief period of time, as a psychological blow to NATO that could also undermine support for the mission back in Canada. The Canadians succeeded, but at a cost of soldiers’ lives. Wattie details the tactics of the task force, recounts the battles and deaths and produces almost a diary of the mission centred on the individual soldiers. Along the way he is critical of the degree to which the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Canadian International Development Agency pulled back on diplomacy and development after the death of diplomat Glyn Berry in an IED attack in 2002, leaving only “defence” of Canada’s “three Ds” on the ground in Kandahar. He also notes acerbically that the U.S. military did not appreciate or understand the role and successes of the Canadians in Kandahar. That may not bode well for the coming months as the United States puts an extra 30,000 soldiers into the country and focuses its attention on Afghanistan.
The aftermath of the Berry attack is the subject of The Long Walk Home: Paul Franklin’s Journey from Afghanistan, which tells the story of Master Corporal Paul Franklin, a medic and the driver of the vehicle in which Berry was killed. It follows his difficult recovery from near death to walking again for his eight-year-old son. He had lost one leg in the attack and, uncertain of recovery, decided to have the other subsequently amputated. Edmonton Journal reporter Liane Faulder skillfully mixes past and present, personal and practical, touching everything from the physics of what happens to a body when an IED explodes nearby to Franklin’s psychological difficulties in coming to grips with the fact that the story he had told everyone about using his medical training to save his own life was fabricated. The mild brain injury he suffered in the explosion created the memory of an incident that never took place. He was “humiliated to have claimed he had tied his own tourniquet. Paul worried what people might think of him. He was also disappointed that, in the end, he hadn’t used his medical skills when it mattered to save his own life. Intellectually, he knew it wasn’t his fault. Emotionally, he was crushed.”
Of all these books, The Long Walk Home is the most important. It takes Canadians behind the scenes to show how the military supports the families of those who die, reunites families with their wounded at a U.S. hospital in Germany when they have been flown out of Kandahar and helps with medical treatment back in Canada. It is a very personal story, told with compassion but also with the honesty that comes with good journalism, about the strain a military life, deployment and reintegration creates in families and relationships, made even more difficult when the soldier comes home wounded or disabled. It is a story about how Franklin confronts replacing the fear of dying with the fear of living without his legs. With tenacity he can walk again, but he must accept the fact that he and his identity have been changed forever.
How do we support those who have served and lived these experiences, when they return to Canada hoping their sacrifices have not been wasted?
Franklin was among the first Canadian casualties from Kandahar. He and his wife, Audra, decided they would be role models for the Forces, allowing the media to turn the spotlight on them. Not all have coped with the difficulties of returning to Canada by subsuming them in a personal mission. Captain Casey Balden, wounded in an IED attack three weeks into his tour, recounts a darker vision in Outside the Wire when encountering troops back from Kandahar in Brandon, Manitoba.
What I see in these soldiers is chaotic: the desire to apply focused violence; the outrage at being helpless; the shock of our silly North American culture; the attempt to deal with deep pain … People have come back from Afghanistan and have changed. Relationships fail. Personal safety is ignored. Identities are fragmented. Ordinary Canadians, those who have not been to war, do not and cannot understand.
Yet understanding and helping are precisely the challenges that Canadians face and ones that, on evidence so far, we as a country are hopelessly unprepared to address. One unanswered question in all these books is how do we as a society support those who have served and lived these experiences, when they return to Canada hoping that their sacrifices and the lives of their friends have not been wasted.
That brings us back to the need to do the right thing in Afghanistan, whatever that is.
Captain Kevin Schamuhn was two metres away from Lieutenant Trevor Greene when Greene was attacked with an axe to the head while sitting at a village council meeting in Shinkay. Schamuhn then spoke to the media about the attack, raising the ire of Canadian Forces public affairs officers. Since then he has thought long about the incident and what it means. Back home, he told Blatchford it is hard enough for Canadians to see soldiers as distributors of foreign aid, let alone for Afghans who for decades have associated foreign occupation with turmoil.
We never really help so why would they trust us? All we really do is ask them the same questions they have been asked for decades. Do their crops get better? No. Do schools get built? Rarely. Do living conditions improve? Hardly. We ought to try to come up with a little more incentive for the locals to side with us rather than accuse them of siding with terrorists.
Schamuhn’s challenge comes at a crucial time. Canada has agreed to broaden the rationale for its presence in Afghanistan from providing security to aiding the Americans in targeting and combating Afghan drug traffickers. That hardly seems the kind of help Afghans need to persuade them this group of foreign invaders is ultimately any different from the many that have come and gone before.
Reviewed:
Outside the Wire: the War in Afghanistan in the Words of Its Participants
KEVIN PATTERSON, JANE WARREN, EDITORS
Vintage Canada
294 pages, softcover
ISBN ISBN 9780307356314
Fifteen Days: Stories of Bravery, Friendship, Life and Death from Inside the New Canadian Army
CHRISTIE BLATCHFORD
Doubleday Canada
400 pages, hardcover
ISBN 9780385664660
Kandahar Tour: The Turning Point in Canada’s Afghan Mission
LEE WINDSOR, DAVID CHARTERS AND BRENT WILSON
John Wiley and Sons
256 pages, hardcover
ISBN 9780470157619
On Assignment in Afghanistan: Maritimers at War
CHRIS LAMBIE (TEXT) AND CHRISTIAN LAFORCE (PHOTOGRAPHY)
Nimbus Publishing
84 pages, softcover
ISBN 9781551096407
Contact Charlie: The Canadian Army, the Taliban and the Battle That Saved Afghanistan
CHRIS WATTIE
Key Porter
304 pages, hardcover
ISBN 9781554700844
The Long Walk Home: Paul Franklin’s Journey from Afghanistan
LIANE FAULDER
Brindle and Glass
182 pages, softcover
ISBN 9781897142257